A targeting complex linking over-the-horizon sensors with the Atacms and PrSM batteries is necessary. To strike a moving target at ranges beyond the horizon, the Army needs more than an innovative new seeker. The Raytheon-Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile struck a decommissioned ship 63 mi. In 2018, the Army conducted the first experiment of a land-based, anti-ship missile during an international maritime exercise at the Pacific Missile Range in Hawaii. Marine Corps plans to introduce the Raytheon-Kongsberg Naval Strike Missile, firing the ground-based anti-ship cruise missile from a remotely operated Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. Targeting ships from land-based artillery systems is not unique to the Army. “As we begin to develop the PrSM with the cross-domain capability against maritime and emitting targets, obviously we’ll be partnering with the Navy on that,” Rafferty says. A follow-on Increment 2 version of PrSM is scheduled to enter service in fiscal 2025, featuring a new maritime seeker now in flight testing by the Army Research Laboratory. The Increment 1 version will extend the range of the Army’s missiles to 500 km. Beginning in fiscal 2023, the Lockheed Martin Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) is scheduled to begin replacing the Atacms. Meanwhile, the Defense Department’s Strategic Capabilities Office started working in 2016 to integrate an existing seeker used for targeting ships into the Army Tactical Missile System (Atacms), which is currently the Army’s longest-range surface-to-surface missile at 300 km (162 nm). The receiver can identify maritime radars, allowing the AH-64E to target watercraft at long range for the first time. The AH-64E Capability Version 6, which Boeing started developing in 2018, includes a modernized radar frequency interferometer. Last year, the Air Force also revived a maritime strike role by activating the Lockheed Martin AGM-158C Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile on the B-1B fleet.īut the Army’s position has changed. The Army operates a small, modest fleet of watercraft, including logistics support vessels and Runnymede-class large landing craft, but service officials have been content to respond to attacks on enemy ships at sea with the Navy’s surface combatants and carrier-based fighter squadrons. “And I think that’ll be a natural evolution into Project Convergence 2021,” Rafferty says, speaking during the Association of the U.S. John Rafferty, the Army’s cross-functional team leader for Long-Range Precision Fires. “I think we have a long way to go in terms of partnering with the Navy for some of the maritime targeting ,” says Brig. The follow-on event next year will expand to include experiments with the Army’s command and control tasks in the unfamiliar maritime domain. The Project Convergence 2020 event in September focused the Army on learning how to solve the command and control challenge for a slew of new land-attack capabilities scheduled to enter service by fiscal 2023. Precision Strike Missile to receive anti-ship role in 2025Īs the Army carves out an offensive role in the Pentagon’s preparations for a mainly naval and air war with China, service officials now seek to develop a capacity for targeting and coordinating strikes on maritime targets with helicopter gunships in the near term and with long-range ballistic missiles by 2025.Project Convergence 2021 to include anti-ship test.Though still focused on its primary role of maneuvering against land forces and shooting down air and missile threats, the Army is quietly developing an arsenal of long-range maritime strike options. Navy and, to a lesser extent, the Air Force, but not anymore. ![]() Finding ever new and efficient ways to sink enemy ships is usually assigned to the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |